This website was started on July 16, 2010
New (2015) : I wrote during the last years a publication of over 400 pages (call the publication a "book" if you would prefer such description) giving much more details with respect to the contents of this website. The title of the publication (book) is "A shattered Equivalence Principle in Physics and a future History of multiple Paradigm Big Bangs in “exact” Science ?". I am making my publication available as an Acrobat Reader pdf file at no cost. You can send me a request for an individual copy. Click here Publication Request Instructions in pdf format to download the request instructions and then follow those instructions to send your request through the Contact facility (situated under "Navigation" at this Home page). At the moment that I receive your Contact request through the internet I will produce a PDF copy of my publication which will be unique to your name and send it to your E-mail address (that you filled in the Contact Form E-mail address text field).
You can download by clicking here an excerpt of my publication (book) in pdf format. This excerpt document of about 75 pages will give you a first idea of what you can expect regarding the contents of my publication.
Sections of the publication (book) :
1. Introduction : short and extended (page 9)
2. General aspects related to science (page 21)
3. History of science regarding matter, space and velocity. Introduction (page 28)
4. History of science regarding matter, space and velocity. Ancient Greek period (600 BC - …) (page 33)
5. History of science regarding matter, space and velocity. Early modern times (~1600-1800) ( page 50)
6. History of science regarding matter, space and velocity. Later modern times (1800-now) and “exactness” of science (page 106)
7. Towards a shattered Equivalence Principle in physics ? (page 139)
8. The dual particle-wave approach of light ; a flawed Michelson-Morley experiment ; a flawed Lorentz’s contraction ; a flawed light clock paradigm (page 159)
9. The paradox of having two different contemporary light paradigms ( page 215)
10. Critique on Einstein’s Relativity Paradigm ; introduction to a disproving laser experiment (page 225)
11. Experimental proof by laser of a flawed Relativity Paradigm ; the concept of a real velocity measuring device ; an additional thought experiment (page 244)
12. Additional flawed Paradigms ; consequences in Physics and the potential of new applications (page 262)
13. The tenacity of a paradigm : on the deafness within a so-called open minded scientific community (page 337)
References (page 421)
Note : I preferred to discuss first within chapters 2-6 of the publication (book) the role of paradigms within the history of science. Many scientists indeed have no idea at all with respect to the concepts as described by Thomas Kuhn regarding the evolution and processes related to the emergence, development and (mostly) decline of "paradigms" in the history of science (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions). Paradigms come and go and were/are/will be replaced by (totally) new (better) ones in that history of science. That can be also a reason why contemporary paradigm believers/defenders are that rigid since their state-of-mind is based on an illusion that the contemporary paradigms they believe in, cannot be wrong since they are "written in stone" and "proven by that many experiments". They are also unaware about Popper's falsification principle that one single destructive anomaly can totally disprove a paradigm (nonetheless the "many experiments proving the paradigm" which then of course should be reconsidered, such as e.g. the Michelson and Morley experiment).Therefore the reading of sections 2-6 could be extremely interesting but of course you could first skip those sections (and read them later which is strongly advised in that case). Sections 7-11 in the publication (book) describe in detail the flaws within contemporary paradigms which are based on light phenomena. When describing light on the basis of photons these flaws become very clear. In section 12 the multiple shortcomings within contemporary physics are highlighted and criticized : the Michelson and Morley experiment paradigm, Mach's relativity paradigm, the falling elevator paradigm, the light clock paradigm, the relativity of simultaneity paradigm, the possibility to travel in the future paradigm, the mirror in the train thought experiment paradigm, the Mercury perihelion shift "explained by relativity" paradigm, the "bending of starlight by the sun" paradigm, etc.
Regarding my critique on the contemporary "Relativity of Simultaneity" paradigm as introduced in science by Einstein through his thought experiment involving an "observer travelling in a train carriage" : you can download by clicking here my critique as a mp4 video file based "relativity of simultaneity" exposition. Please allow your computer some time to download this mp4 file of about 25 Mbyte. Please activate also the speakers of your computer when playing the video in order to listen to the verbal parts of my exposition. You can also look at and listen to the same video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ex0bATIFg3M.
As a researcher in multiple domains I wrote multiple publications and if you would be interested in a reference/example in that respect you can eventually download my publication "Finite elements-based 2D theoretical analysis of the effect of IEX membrane thickness and salt solution residence time on the ion transport within a salinity gradient power reverse electrodialysis half cell pair" at http://www.reapower.eu/publications.html regarding my specific research in salinity gradient power by reverse electrodialysis.
Some keywords regarding this website : Newton / Newton's absolute space / real space / absolute time / real (absolute) velocity / absolute rest / absolute velocity measuring device / Michelson and Morley exp / Michelson Morley exp / Michelson-Morley exp / Lorentz contraction / laser experiment / anomaly / light / photon / quanta / relativity of simultaneity / Einstein / thought experiment / thinking out of the box / absolute-relativity
This website introduces an alternative laser experiment which revealed an anomaly with respect to the existing paradigms on light phenomena. The format of a "publication" is somewhat implemented in the build of this website, by using Menu Tabs showing the titles of the sections (such as Introduction or Experimental) in a typical "publication". Those sections are briefly introduced now. You can decide to skip some sections such as e.g. the Introduction or Application sections when preferring to read other sections first.
The views as presented on this website are supported by Etienne Brauns, Luc Martens, Mon Gysen and multiple other persons ; these views were also deposited officialy in front of a notary (in 2006) and were the subject of a patent text.
In this section you can read in brief about the existence of "paradigms" in science and the defense of those "indisputable" paradigms by those scientists who think exclusively from "within their box". Those paradigm believers thus will defend by circle referencing their paradigms from their "in the box" knowledge. As a result, they simply discard other views immediately from a closed-state-of-mind, as was experienced during multiple attempts to first publish the contents of this website in typical scientific journals. Since all these attempts seemed to be in vain, it was decided to bring the information through the Internet to those scientists who have at least an open mind and are willing to have a detailed look at the contents of this website (in particular the extremely confronting Figure 2 in 2.1 and Figure 24 in 3.1 !) and to then decide on the importance of the views as presented since they reveal massive flaws in contemporary paradigms, being based on light.
As a starter on "paradigms" : is the equation, here below, imagination or reality ? It is up to you to reflect upon. You can also download a document for support during that reflection ; click here : Euler and e
An alternative experiment using a laser was performed and an important anomaly with respect to the existing paradigms could effectively be demonstrated, in a reproducible way. The straightforward laser experiment is directly discussed in "2. Experimental" as to fix your attention immediately on the anomaly (have therefore certainly a look at Figure 2 in 2.1) which questions multiple contemporary paradigms and thus also the null result of the Michelson and Morley experiment. This should definitely stirr your interest with respect to further reading and eventually performing the revealing laser experiment yourself or in cooperation with your colleagues. Please also read my extensive publication (of over 400 pages).
In this section some further specific views are presented related to the actual paradigms. Next to the confronting Figure 2 in section "Experimental" the Figure 24 in 3.1 reveals in addition a massive inconsistency within contemporary paradigms with respect to their classic "ray of light" based modelling of light phenomena ! Contemporary paradigms do not save the real photon phenomena happening in the single and unique real space. With respect to the concept of Cartesian based reference frames, as used in a classic way in physics, an important fact is that an observer on earth in reality also travels at the orbit velocity of our planet through space. The earth's orbit velocity is indeed estimated in the literature to be an astounding 30000 meter per second. It is then shown that the Lorentz contraction is merely an artificial mathematical construction within a virtual mathematical space in a human's mind which does not save the phenomena of photons in the real space outside that human's mind. A key issue is the conclusion that the Cartesian based mathematical reference frame, which is used by an observer who moves in real space, is fully unable to graphically represent correctly the position of a photon's past position in real space. This requires from a reader a profound Gestalt Switch during the reading of that section in order to be able to abandon her/his "in the box reasoning" resulting from the existing paradigms that (s)he was trained in.
Here, the principle of a real (absolute) velocity measuring device is discussed.
In this section, the relativity of Simultaneity as discussed by Einstein in his thought experiment is analyzed in more detail in 5.1. Einstein simply overlooked the fact that the light signal coming from the location B positioned to the right of location M (M is in the middle between location A and B) needs as specific time to travel in the direction of location M. Therefore the light signal coming from B will NOT meet the observer Obs2 in the train compartment in location M but in a location C to the right of location M as a result of the train compartment also having moved to the right during the time interval needed for the light signal coming from location B to meet Obs2. So Obs2 does NOT meet that signal from B in M but in location C and moreover at a specific time instance. In the same way the light signal coming from location A will only catch up with Obs2 in a location D to the right of C and moreover at another different time instance (see also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lvx945SP-RM for a slide show based visual presentation of these facts). Einstein thus seemingly missed the straightforward "meeting character" of his thought experiment and never presented such an analysis with respect to meeting locations, meeting times and velocity. It can thus be shown through such a detailed analysis that the observer Obs2 in the train compartment indeed is able to decide on the simultaneity when taking into account those meeting locations C and D and the meeting time instances (by also using the real (absolute) velocity measuring device as described in this website (and in more detail in the publication) and a light clock, also based on the real photon phenomena). So all that fully counters Einstein's "relativity of simultaneity" paradigm. The Michelson and Morley experiment is also discussed (see 5.2) and an important effect which was never considered in that experiment is pointed to. That effect should definitely be looked into to verify if the "null result" of the Michelson and Morley experiment can be explained from that point of view. The alternative laser experiment as presented in the section "Experimental" in fact also questions that "null result"
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. Arthur Schopenhauer
Time and again the passion for understanding has led to the illusion that man is able to comprehend the objective world rationally by pure thought without any empirical foundations, in short - by metaphysics. Albert Einstein
Truth is what stands the test of experience. Albert Einstein
One experiment can prove me wrong. Albert Einstein